Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate the conceptual thoughts or ideas and research results that have been achieved in the area of Nursing. Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Orthopedi (JIKO), particularly focuses on the main problems in the development of the sciences of Nursing and Health areas as follows: 1. Childcare; 2. Surgical medical nursing; 3. Emergency nursing; 4. Community Nursing; 5. Maternity Nursing; 6. Mental care; 7. Any specific issues of Nursing.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Blind Review Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In each manuscript, the peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.


Manuscript processing time in JIKO

1.The author has 12 days waiting period on the first article submission, the section editor will decide whether the article needs to be revised or not 2.Section editor needs 5 days to examine the article based on JIKO author guideline 3.The author has 7 days to revise the article consistent with the JIKO author guideline 4.The revised article given to the editor to be reviewed, the editorial team needs 15 days to finish the review. 5.If the article Declined, section editor has 3 days to inform the author regarding the editorial team decision 6.If the article Revision Required, the editorial team will proceed the article to the reviewer 7.Reviewer has 30 days to review the article divided into two times review and provide the decision, Accepted or Declined 8.The editorial team discusses the final decision in an editorial team meeting whether the articles recommended by the reviewers proceed to be Published or Declined. The editorial team has 20 days to make the final decision. 9.The soon-to-be-published articles, lay-outed by the section editor for 30 days 10.The author has 3 days to confirm the layout result. 11.Section editor publishes the accepted articles.


Publication Frequency

Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Orthopedi (JIKO), p-ISSN = 2580-1112, e-ISSN 2655-6669, published twice a year in January and July


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More... https://www.lockss.org/


Publication Ethics


Duties of Authors

1.Reporting Standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. 2.Data Access and Retention: Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. 3.Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. 4.Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. 5.Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. 6.Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. 7.Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. 8.Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. 9.Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.


Duties of Editors

1.Fair Play: An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. 2.Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. 3.Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. 4.Publication Decisions: The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. 5.Review of Manuscripts: The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.


Duties of Reviewers

1.Contribution to Editorial Decisions: The peer-review process assists the editor in making editorial decisions and helps the author to improve his manuscript. 2.Promptness: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. 3.Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. 4.Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor. 5.Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 6.Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


Screening for Plagiarism

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using it henticate applications with a similar level of maximum 15% when published.


Author Fees

This journal does not charge any author fees. Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR) Fast-Track Review: 750.000 (IDR) Article Publication: 500.000 (IDR)



T: Bagaimana cara mengirim artikel ke JIKO (Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan Orthopedi) ?
J: untuk bisa mengirim artikel, anda terlebih dahulu harus mendaftar. Setelah mendaftar anda harus login dan klik New Submission, kemudian ikuti 5 langkah yang ada. Untuk panduan lebih lengkap silahkan buka laman:


T: Saya sudah Register, tapi ketika login saya tidak menemukan menu New Submission
J: kemungkinan anda ketika register lupa menceklis menu author. Untuk bisa mengaktifkannya silahkan hubungi admin kami admin@ejournal.akperfatmawati.ac.id dan atau SMS/WA/TLP 6285213138613

T: Bagaimana mengentahui status artikel yang saya kirimkan?
J: Untuk mengetahui status Artikel yang anda kirim, silahkan Login dan lihat status artikel tersebut. Lebih lanjut bisa baca panduan berikut :


T: Apa yang harus saya lakukan jika saya menerima keputusan artikel ‘Revision Required’?
J: silahkan pada panduan berikut:https://ejournal.akperfatmawati.ac.id/index.php/JIKO/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

T: Bagaimana caranya saya upload hasil perbaikan artikel yang saya kirimkan?

J: silahkan pada panduan berikut:https://ejournal.akperfatmawati.ac.id/index.php/JIKO/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

pertanyaan lainnya silahkan bisa kontak admin kami melalui jiko@akperfatmawati.ac.id dan atau SMS/WA/TLP 6285213138613